Account Inventory
Catalogue codes, names, types, balances, activity and reporting use.
Review, rationalise, map and document your chart of accounts through an India-based accounting team—while authorised client reviewers retain all policy, hierarchy, balance-transfer and system-change decisions.
Chart of accounts cleanup examines the codes, names, types, hierarchy and usage rules that organise general-ledger activity. It identifies duplicates, vague labels, inactive accounts, inconsistent groupings and structures that no longer support operations or reporting.
Our team can analyse activity and prepare a controlled change plan. The client retains responsibility for accounting policy, account types, reporting hierarchy, tax mappings, opening or transferred balances, system configuration, approval, implementation and final financial-statement presentation.
The exact scope depends on entity count, ledger history, reporting requirements, tax mappings, software constraints, integrations and approved future-state design.
Catalogue codes, names, types, balances, activity and reporting use.
Identify potentially overlapping accounts and compare their historical use.
Flag unused or legacy accounts for client-authorised restriction or archive.
Prepare clearer account names and descriptions using approved conventions.
Surface potentially inconsistent asset, liability, income and expense types.
Map accounts to approved reporting categories and statement sections.
Prepare controlled old-to-new code maps where system rules permit.
Compare entity structures and prepare standardisation recommendations.
Document mappings, impacts, exceptions and implementation status.
A staged process protects historical reporting and downstream systems.
Extract accounts, activity, balances and reporting relationships.
Identify duplicates, gaps, ambiguity and inactive accounts.
Prepare proposed names, groups, codes and mappings.
Review history, reports, integrations and balance implications.
Client confirms policy, mappings and implementation decisions.
Compare approved changes and post-change reporting outputs.
AI-assisted tools may help group similar names, detect potential duplicates, analyse usage and suggest mappings where appropriate.
It can identify duplicate or vague accounts, inconsistent account types, inactive codes, fragmented reporting groups, unclear naming and structures that no longer match the business.
No. We prepare analysis and recommendations. Accounts with balances, history, reporting dependencies or integrations require authorised client review and controlled implementation.
Potentially. We can compare structures and prepare group mappings, while entity-specific accounting, tax, statutory and operational requirements remain client-controlled.
Yes. A reviewed chart and documented source-to-target map can improve migration readiness, but target configuration and final conversion rules require client approval.
AI may suggest similarities and patterns, but account purpose, type, hierarchy, history and reporting consequences require qualified human judgement.
Typically, we review the account list, types, balances, transaction history, reports, entities, dimensions, integrations, tax mappings, target structure and responsible reviewers.
Share your current account list, reporting structure, entities and known classification issues. We’ll assess the change pathway before recommending a practical scope.